🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have harvested a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is preparing to release them online.

Possible Boost for AI Development

Industry experts noted the apparent data breach could boost artificial intelligence firms looking for material to develop their models.

An entity called Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million entries of associated data such as artist and album names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not represent its full inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a company representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a third party collected public metadata and employed illicit tactics to bypass DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They claimed the music files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, remarked the breached music would likely be utilized for developing AI models.

“Educating models on pirated data is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The group's website makes references to LibGen, a vast online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.

A founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive added it could also enable technology firms to “educate models on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between artists, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Proposals and Responses

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government proposal to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, research and technology informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.